Diary of A Rural Manager !: FPO<script async='async' data-ad-client='ca-pub-2911943216841049' src='https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js'></script>

Providing interest-free loans and tax holidays is a subsidy. In fact, the corporates thrive on such subsidies. Corporations use most of the loopholes and tax dodges to avoid their taxes that may be technically ‘legal’ in the sense as the tax law allows them. But those subsidies got into the tax code because corporations lobbied to put them there. Saying something is ‘legal’ doesn't mean that it’s ethical.

The difference being, these subsidies are called ‘incentives for growth’. But, strangely, it is always subsidies for the poor/farmers that come under the scanner. Even big individual agriculturists are not taxable in this country, whereas when they collectivize themselves, they were being taxed. Institutions promoting FPOs and Union agriculture ministry were seeking income-tax exemption for FPOs for a long time.

Union Budget has proposed that FPCs, registered under the Companies Act, having an annual turnover up to INR 100 crore need not pay tax on profits derived from farm-related activities. There was the deduction of income under section 80P of the Income-tax Act of producer companies registered under Par IX-A of the companies Act. This is a welcome step but many hindrances still remain. For those interested, a detailed note on the need for tax benefit to FPO by Dr. Irina Garg, Director General of NIAM was shared with the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare and the Ministry of Finance.

To the Registrar of Companies, the FPO is just another form of a company. Therefore, the cost and burden of reporting are disproportionately huge, as the rules are the same as what would apply to a corporate. Any reporting shortfalls or violations attract huge fines from RoCs. Institutions that championed the cause of FPOs have been vocal about the need for a lighter regulatory & reporting regime for FPOs. Thus far, this issue has not received attention. Unless that is done, the risks that farmer directors face are serious.

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Udaan : Flight out of Poverty

There is neither Perfect Market Competition nor Perfect Community Cooperation. The middle path of community owned enterprise competing in the market has always both social capital and market presence. The rise of the creative economy encourages self-interest over collective action in the society, but all is not lost. There is a Value-proposition for setting FPO (Farmer Producer Organization). Udaipur Agro Producer Company Limited, (UAPCL) is one such producer company focused on strengthening the livelihoods of the community. Here is the glimpse through this video in which yours truly has small part -

Saturday, March 21, 2015

GoI circular on FPO

GoI had issued a circular for Farmers producer organisations (FPOs) on 11th February 2014. As per circular, FPOs may be treated at par with cooperatives and other quasi- governmental institutions providing common service facilities to the farmers/users in Rashtriya Krishi vikas yojana (RKVY). Please check the circular on the government website.

Monday, March 2, 2015

Funding Mechanism for Farmer Producer Organizations

Progressing with the previous discussion of FPO: Public Policy & Value Chain Development, we are looking into credit accessibility of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs). India is successful despite the government because of the entrepreneurship, energy, and ingenuity of the Indian people. Our smallholder farmers are not marginal recipients of charity but instead customer entrepreneurs. Even with the linking of small and marginal farmers to FPOs, the question of reliable and affordable sources of financing for the capital requirement of Infrastructure and operation always lingers for the farmers. There is always the issue of access to credit in the agrarian sector. There are many donor agencies like International foundations, Domestic Foundations, Business related CSR, and government schemes for financing credit to FPOs. But the search for such donors with big pockets for solving the problem is elusive and unsustainable way.

Formal financial institutions (FIs) are wary of lending to these bodies, largely due to the absence of collective land titles (for collateralization) and credit tools for customer assessment. For a nascent FPO, FIs require collateral and three-year balance sheets. That sums up the tragedy of the situation. There are proposed funds coming up for the support of FPOs. I am enlisting them as per my knowledge. But the author is not legally liable for the information provided here. This is collected through various online sources and workshops.

Grants:

1. Equity Guarantee Fund- The Equity Grant Fund enables eligible FPOs to receive a grant equivalent in amount to the equity contribution of their shareholder members in the FPO, thus enhancing the overall capital base of the FPO. The Scheme shall address eligible FPOs, which have paid up capital not exceeding Rs. 30 lahks as of the date of application. Equity Grant shall be a cash infusion equivalent to the amount of shareholder equity in the FPO subject to a cap of Rs. 10 lahks per FPO.

2. Sectoral Fund- Under NRLM, there is a provision that states agencies (SRLM) develop partnerships with major government programmes and build synergies to address different dimensions of poverty and deprivation. Every Producer Organization will receive Sectoral Fund (SF) up to Rs. 20 Lac, in two installments, to invest in value chain development for livelihood promotion. The first installment of SF will be given to the PO within two months of its formation (mini. 100 members) with minimum paperwork. This installment can be up to Rs. 5 Lac. On completion of the establishment phase, the PO will submit a Business Strategy Report to RRLP together with a requisition for release of next installment. The second installment can go up to a maximum of Rs. 15 lac.

Loan Product:

1. With Collateral- NABARD has created a dedicated corpus to provide loans to producer organizations. Yet, NABARD demands FPO to offer collateral (15%of loan amount) at the interest rate of 10.5~ 11.5 %. There is a clear impact on collateral offered over the interest rate. Since most of the FPOs are formed by small and marginal farmers, they lack collateral.

2. Without Collateral- Interest computation on daily principal outstanding of drawn amount. Flexibility to use the funds only when required thereby leading to huge savings on interest cost of (13.5-14.5) %. The agency (mostly NBFC) will take a 1% upfront processing fee and SFAC will charge 0.85% of guarantor fees. There is NO collateral required for the loan. Through the setting up of the Credit Guarantee Fund, SFAC has enabled a few credit institutions to provide collateral-free credit to FPOs by minimizing their lending risks in respect of loans not exceeding Rs. 100.00 lakhs. The lending institution shall be bound to comply with such directions as SFAC may deem fit to issue from time to time, for facilitating recoveries of the guaranteed account or safeguarding its interest as a guarantor.

3. Warehouse Receipt Finance- This seems a feasible option when the working capital crunch is over. FPO is targeting commodities like Soya bean, Cotton (including bales), Mustard, Maize, Wheat, Sugar, Paddy, Cashew, Castor, Chilli, and Turmeric only.

All the grant and loan appraisal process is designed with various parameters depending on the policies of FIs. They all focus on the high representation of women in membership as well as in the Board of Directors(BoDs). Hence, a small step in the direction of empowerment of women is taken. Thus enabling women's participation increases the chance of wealth ownership and leadership. Structural discrimination against Women, Dalits, and Adivasis can be prevented by giving voices in such forums linking business with social change.

It is the right time for financial institutions to come up with innovative financial products targeted at FPOs. On banking parameters, if not adopted, FPO policy can't be scaled up. The transformation of FPO can only happen in phases from Grants, Soft loans, and then linkage to mainstream banking institutions. Banking institutions and the rural community have a lot of ground to cover for implementing FPO policy on the ground. Even with so much of changing policies, the FPO model deserves tax holidays in the initial years to build surplus and reserves. The taxation policy of FPO (30%), insurance, and, license issues are more complex topics to be discussed in upcoming blog posts.

Sources ---

1) Equity Grant and Credit Guarantee Fund Scheme For Farmer Producer Companies

2) Financing and supporting Producer Organisations

3) Project Implementation Plan(PIP) Manual of Rajasthan Grameen Ajeevika Vikas Parishad (RGAVP)

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

FPO: Public Policy & Value Chain Development

A basic concept can be read here:2014 - Year of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) before going further ahead in this topic.

Public Policy: There is always so much talk on FDI in retail, so it seems a good state to channel the same money for farmers’ producers’ cooperatives and ensure they get good margins and market access. The government of India (GoI) already invest Rs 275,000 crore in an agricultural subsidy budget that is constantly touted and needs to be unpacked. Who is the real beneficiary of these subsidies, farmers, or seeds, fertilizer manufacturers, and agricultural banks? That is where good public policy comes into play.

The government of India (GoI) is promoting the concept of Farmer Producer Organizations going in the right step to engage and adapt agriculture to the market system. The primary objective of the collective mobilization of farmers into FPOs is to enhance the production, productivity, and profitability of especially small farmers in the country. FPO will be positioned as a gateway agency between the farmers and markets. The complete Policy and Process Guidelines for Farmer Producer Organizations; is a good framework. FPO policy will give auxiliary advantages like women’s empowerment.

Policy guidelines are the first step but we need awareness of this novel concept among a diverse range of stakeholders: the farming community, State Governments, Banks and other financial institutions, Civil society organizations, the media, and elected representatives of the people. Policies that impede the growth of FPOs, such as APMC laws, tenancy provisions, cold storage, etc. must be amended with changing times.

Value Chain Development: With the below diagram, we see how Value Chain is different from Supply Chain.

Value chain development interventions focus on improving business operations and relationships (even contractual) at the level of primary producers, processors, and other actors in the chain. Production, harvesting, procurement, grading, pooling, handling, marketing, selling, and exporting of primary produce comes under the scope of the value chain. It can also include preserving, drying, distilling, brewing, venting, canning, and packaging the produce of its members.

Value chain analysis starts with mapping the volume of products, the number of people engaged, the geographical flow of products, and value at different levels of value chains. The supply and demand side of the business can be understood with the result of analysis only. Only then, we can start with the business planning of the enterprise. All the members of FPO are primarily farmers only but we need to build their capacities on trading, accounting, and hoarding practices over time. Farmer Producer Organizations can only result in more sustainable and better-performing business plans when farmers have a good understanding of value chain systems.

FPOs are nee steps towards organizations having higher financial autonomy and lesser government subsidy. Possibly the biggest failure of GoI is the promotion and formation of good organizations in the agriculture sector. Let us look for the big question in the livelihood sector: Is a full-fledged value chain development project through FPO the best way to bring about development? If not, then what is an alternative!

Saturday, November 15, 2014

2014 - Year of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs)

I always remember the words of Chinese Premier Deng Xiaoping - "It doesn't matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice." So, now NGOs and the government are finally coming to the phase of acceptance of market forces in the development sector. The cooperative movement is already a failure except for a few notable examples. The government has never managed to manage any scheme efficiently. The government is partnering with various professional organizations for setting up a new institution in the country - Farmers Producer Company (FPC) / Farmer Producer Organizations (FPO). The legal framework is ready under the Companies Act. According to this new law, only farmer–producers can be members of the FPC and the farmer members themselves will manage this company. It takes care of the flaws in the cooperative societies but has also borrowed the strengths of the corporate companies.

FPO/FPC will be dominating future debates on livelihood and its success depends on the implementation and design of the program. Pieces of evidence will come for pros and cons of such initiative, no matter how reliable, have to be interpreted. Interpretations can differ and do differ, and such differences account for an explanation. That is a future full of possibilities. I will be updating this space related to FPO. The chart will give an overview of the FPO structure and purpose. It is a bit late to post here but the Calendar year 2014 is declared as the “Year of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs)”.

Pages

Thursday, April 7, 2022

Monday, January 24, 2022

Saturday, April 21, 2018

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Saturday, March 21, 2015

Monday, March 2, 2015

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Saturday, November 15, 2014