Jul 3, 2026

Introduction to CSR in India – Part I: From Corporate Giving to Corporate Responsibility

Why CSR is no longer optional in spirit

CSR in India is often reduced to one simple idea: companies giving money for a good cause. That view is incomplete.

Corporate Social Responsibility is not just charity. It is a governance-backed commitment to use corporate resources for social, environmental, and economic value creation. In India, CSR has a legal foundation under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, supported by the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014. Eligible companies are required to spend on CSR and disclose how that money is planned, approved, implemented, monitored, and reported. India’s framework makes CSR a board-level responsibility, not just a philanthropic side activity. 

This legal design reflects a broader policy idea: companies do not operate in a vacuum. They use public resources, benefit from local communities, and depend on social stability, ecological resilience, and institutional trust. That is why CSR in India sits at the intersection of governance, strategy, compliance, and impactThe law does require eligible companies to spend on CSR, but it also expects those expenditures to be thoughtfully planned, approved, monitored, disclosed, and aligned to accepted social priorities. 

Which companies fall under CSR?

A company is required to comply with CSR provisions if, during the immediately preceding financial year, it meets any one of the following thresholds: net worth of ₹500 crore or more, turnover of ₹1,000 crore or more, or net profit of ₹5 crore or more. Such companies are expected to spend at least 2% of the average net profits of the three immediately preceding financial years on CSR activities, subject to the framework laid down under Section 135 and the CSR Rules.

India’s CSR spending has also become too large to treat casually. CSR expenditure increased from ₹10,065.93 crore in FY 2014-15 to ₹34,908.75 crore in FY 2023-24, with 27,188 companies reporting CSR spending in FY 2023-24.

This is important because CSR applicability is not based on corporate intent, brand positioning, or sustainability claims; it is triggered by financial thresholds. Once covered, the company must create an internal governance structure around CSR. This is where many organisations move from “doing some good work” to building a formal and accountable CSR system. There is a shift — from ad hoc donations to a due diligence-driven, policy-backed, board-governed process

CSR is a board-driven process

One of the most important features of India’s CSR architecture is that it is board-driven. Section 135 requires the constitution of a CSR Committee in applicable cases, and the committee is expected to formulate and recommend the CSR Policy, recommend the amount of expenditure, and monitor the policy from time to time. The Board, in turn, must approve the CSR Policy, disclose its contents in the Board’s report, place it on the company website, and ensure that approved CSR activities are actually undertaken.  

This board-driven structure matters for two reasons. First, it makes CSR part of corporate governance rather than leaving it to goodwill alone. Second, it demands documented decision-making: identifying priority areas, selecting projects, choosing implementing partners, approving budgets, tracking spend, and recording outcomes.  

Good CSR starts with governance hygiene. A strong CSR system usually includes:

  • a functioning CSR Committee;
  • a Board-approved CSR Policy;
  • an annual action plan;
  • project-wise budgets;
  • clear implementation responsibilities;
  • partner due diligence;
  • fund utilisation processes;
  • monitoring and reporting mechanisms;
  • treatment of unspent CSR amounts;
  • documentation for audit and disclosure.

What can count as CSR?

CSR is not an open-ended bucket of “good things.” Eligible CSR activities are expected to fall within the broad areas listed under Schedule VII of the Companies Act. These include activities such as eradicating hunger, poverty and malnutrition; promoting health care and sanitation; promoting education and livelihood enhancement; gender equality; environmental sustainability; protection of national heritage; support for armed forces veterans; sports promotion; contributions to specified public funds; support to technology incubators and research; rural development; and slum area development.

Good CSR is not about spreading money thinly across scattered causes. It is stronger when a company develops a sector focus, stays with two or three thematic areas, builds institutional expertise, and aligns intervention design with both community priorities and the company’s broader values or competencies. In that sense, Schedule VII provides the legal perimeter, but strategy determines the depth and quality of impact within that perimeter.

What does not count as CSR?

The CSR Rules make it equally clear that not every socially sounding expenditure qualifies as CSR. Activities in the normal course of business, activities undertaken outside India (with limited exceptions for Indian sports personnel), political contributions, activities benefiting employees of the company, sponsorships done mainly for marketing benefits, and activities undertaken to fulfil other statutory obligations are excluded from CSR.

This distinction is vital because many first-time CSR practitioners confuse philanthropy, branding, compliance spending, and employee welfare with legal CSR. The discipline of CSR lies in ensuring that projects are socially relevant, legally eligible, and administratively defensible. Documentation, partner checks, utilisation tracking, reporting, and impact orientation are so crucial. In CSR, intent matters — but so do process and proof. 

CSR policy is not a brochure — it is a governance document

A mature CSR system begins with a well-drafted CSR Policy. Under the law, the policy should indicate the activities to be undertaken by the company in line with Schedule VII. A good CSR Policy answers practical questions:

  • What themes will the company prioritise?
  • Which geographies will it focus on?
  • Will projects be implemented directly or through partners?
  • How will partners be selected?
  • Who approves projects?
  • How will funds be released?
  • What documents are required for utilisation?
  • How will monitoring be done?
  • What happens to surplus or unspent CSR funds?
  • When is impact assessment required?
  • How will outcomes be reported?

Companies that treat the CSR Policy as a living management document usually build better programmes. Those that treat it only as a website disclosure often struggle during monitoring, audit, or board review.

A CSR policy is not a communications document. It is an accountability document. Companies that treat policy as a living management instrument usually build stronger project portfolios than those that treat it as a website disclosure.

Why implementing agencies matter

CSR can be undertaken directly by the company or through eligible implementing agencies. The rules recognise channels such as Section 8 companies, registered public trusts, registered societies, certain government-established entities, and eligible entities with the required registration and qualifications under the CSR Rules. Entities intending to undertake CSR activities are required to register by filing Form CSR-1, after which a unique CSR Registration Number is generated. Companies are also required to make annual CSR disclosures through the prescribed reporting framework, including CSR-2 in the MCA system.

But legal eligibility is only the starting point.Before selecting an implementing agency, companies should examine:

  • legal constitution and registration documents;
  • CSR-1 registration;
  • 12A and 80G status, where relevant;
  • FCRA status, if foreign contribution is involved;
  • past project experience;
  • audited financial statements;
  • governance structure;
  • board or trustee profile;
  • field team strength;
  • donor history;
  • utilisation certificate practices;
  • monitoring systems;
  • litigation or reputational risks;
  • experience in the proposed geography and theme.

In practical terms, CSR partner due diligence should include review through databases such as NGO Darpan and other publicly available information. That is how companies reduce leakage, misalignment, and reputational risk.

What changed in 2026

As of 13 June 2026, the main change in India’s CSR law in 2026 is the MCA notification dated 27 May 2026 that allows companies to fulfill a portion of their CSR obligation through Zero Coupon Zero Principal (ZCZP) instruments issued by eligible Not for Profit Organizations (NPOs) registered on the Social Stock Exchange (SSE).  The 2026 amendment inserted definitions for:
  • “Not for Profit Organization”, linked to the definition under SEBI’s ICDR framework, and
  • “Zero coupon zero principal instrument”, defined as a security issued by an eligible NPO registered on the SSE segment of a recognised stock exchange.
A company can use this route only up to 10% of its total CSR expenditure for that financial year. The balance CSR amount must continue to be deployed through other permitted routes. If a company subscribes to a ZCZP instrument, the company is exempt from undertaking impact assessment for projects funded through that instrument.

From cheque-writing to strategic alignment

CSR should be strategically aligned but not reduced to branding. That is exactly the balance good companies need. Strategic alignment means the company chooses causes it can commit to over multiple years, where it can build ecosystems, demonstrate seriousness, and create genuine visibility through outcomes rather than publicity. This may involve linking CSR themes to issues such as livelihoods, climate resilience, education, waste, water, rural development, gender inclusion, or responsible value chains — all while staying within Schedule VII.

For example, a company may choose to focus on decent work and livelihoods, responsible consumption and waste, or climate-linked community resilience, while linking those programmes conceptually to broader development agendas such as the Sustainable Development Goals. The legal framework does not mandate SDG language, but the policy logic of CSR strongly supports it because it helps companies move from one-off activities to structured portfolios with clear outcomes.

The real purpose of CSR

At its best, CSR is not a legal minimum or a reputation shield. It is the discipline of asking: Where can corporate resources create durable public value? It requires listening before spending, governing before announcing, and measuring before claiming. Companies that do this well treat CSR as a long-term social investment — not in the financial sense of return extraction, but in the sense of strengthening communities, institutions, and environmental systems that make inclusive growth possible,

That is why an introduction to CSR should not end with applicability thresholds or committee composition. It should end with a mindset: CSR is where corporate purpose is tested through governance, implementation, and evidence. In the next part, we will move from the “what” of CSR to the “how” — how to design CSR projects, select implementing partners, manage funds responsibly, monitor progress, and build impact.

Hero MotoCorp: CSR linked to road safety, biodiversity, and inclusion

Hero MotoCorp’s CSR work is useful because it shows how a company can connect CSR with the social risks and responsibilities of its own sector. As a two-wheeler manufacturer, road safety is not a random CSR theme for Hero; it is directly connected to the mobility ecosystem in which the company operates.

Under its Hero WeCare CSR umbrella, the company frames its CSR vision around building a“Greener, Safer and Equitable World.” Its focus areas include biodiversity protection, renewable energy, water conservation, road safety training parks, road-safety awareness, education, skill development, preventive healthcare, community welfare, sports promotion, and support for heroes of the nation.

This makes Hero MotoCorp a good example of strategic CSR alignment. The company is not only funding generic social causes; it is choosing themes that make sense for its business context. For instance, road safety is especially relevant because two-wheelers form a major part of India’s mobility landscape. Hero’s CSR programmes such as Ride Safe India, road safety training parks, and awareness campaigns show how CSR can address a sector-linked public problem without becoming a marketing exercise.

In FY 2024-25, Hero MotoCorp reportedly spent ₹80.54 crore on CSR initiatives, against a CSR obligation of ₹79.99 crore, impacting around 8.47 lakh beneficiaries through its Hero WeCare platform. Its CSR work has also been reported to have impacted 1.4 million people through initiatives in education, livelihoods, road safety awareness, and biodiversity conservation. 

Hero MotoCorp’s Sustainability Report 2024-25 also places CSR within a wider ESG architecture, covering climate action, energy management, water management, waste management, circularity, product stewardship, biodiversity protection, human rights, diversity and inclusion, occupational health and safety, customer engagement, CSR, business ethics, risk management, and value chain management. 

The important lesson from Hero MotoCorp is this: CSR becomes stronger when it is not isolated from business realities. A mobility company can meaningfully work on road safety. A manufacturer can work on water, waste, circularity, and biodiversity around its operations. A large employer can support skilling and inclusion. The point is not to convert CSR into business promotion, but to use a company’s context to identify where its responsibility is most real.

Reference list

Jun 29, 2026

How to Land — and succeed in — Your Dream Role: A Practical Career Playbook

A strong career is rarely built through one big breakthrough. More often, it is the result of getting the basics right, communicating your value clearly, and showing consistent effort over time. Whether you are applying for jobs, trying to pivot, or aiming for faster growth, the formula is simple: build your toolkit, sharpen your story, and execute with discipline.


1) Start with the basic job toolkit

Your first priority is to build the essentials: resume, LinkedIn, and interview preparation. These three elements form your professional toolkit. A resume should be concise, achievement-led, and easy to scan. A LinkedIn profile should reinforce your positioning and credibility. Interview prep should help you speak clearly about your experience, motivations, and strengths.

Focus on:

  • A 1–2-pages resume with strong action verbs and measurable outcomes
  • An ATS-friendly format without graphics, logos, or clutter
  • A LinkedIn profile that reflects your current narrative and target roles

2) Answer “Tell me about yourself” with structure

This question is not asking for your life story. It is asking whether you can connect your professional experience, personal motivation, and role fit into a clear narrative. A strong answer shows what you do, who you are, and why you fit this role.

A good response should include:

  • What you do professionally
  • Who you are as a person and problem-solver
  • Why this role makes sense for you now

3) Know your three core strengths

To stand out, you should be clear on the specific strengths you bring and how they create value. Employers are not looking for generic words like “hardworking” or “passionate.” They want to know how you think, work, and deliver.

Strong examples of strengths:

  • Structured problem-solving
  • Communication and stakeholder handling
  • Execution discipline and reliability

Together, these strengths answer a key question: how will you add value to the organization?

4) Be intentional about why you want the role

When you answer “Why do you want to work here?”, avoid generic praise. The best answers connect facts about the organization with your own goals and interests. You should show that you understand the company, respect its work, and see a strong alignment with your own path.

A good answer combines:

  • One fact about the organization’s mission or reputation
  • One point about the role, team, or kind of work
  • One reason it aligns with your background and ambitions

5) Plan + method + discipline = landing the role

Dream roles are not achieved through motivation alone. They require a clear plan, a working method, and discipline in execution. You need to know what roles you are targeting, what skills are required, and what actions you will repeat every week.

Winning habits include:

  • Targeting specific roles instead of applying randomly
  • Tailoring your resume and outreach
  • Tracking applications, conversations, and follow-ups consistently

6) Positive attitude + perseverance + effort = success

Getting the offer is only the beginning. Long-term success comes from attitude and consistency. In any role, people notice professionals who stay calm under pressure, work hard without drama, and keep improving even when progress feels slow.

This means:

  • Showing up with energy and ownership
  • Staying resilient through setbacks
  • Putting in steady effort instead of chasing shortcuts
  • Become someone others look up to in times of crisis.

7) What consulting really teaches you

In today’s world, information is easy to access. The real value of a consultant is not just knowing things — it is being able to adapt knowledge to local context, frame problems clearly, and tell a compelling story people can act on. Consultants rarely “give all the answers.” Their real job is often to clarify options, surface trade-offs, and support implementation thinking.

To paraphrase Daniel Pink, in a world of Google, where our clients have access to the same information that we do, our competitive advantage lies in adapting global knowledge to the local context and telling a compelling story The thinking is not to create an independent voice as consultant for elite but to articulate the voice of those people working in such sector. We did not set out to produce ‘answers’ as ‘smart people’”. This strategy also aimed to build legitimacy and support.

Good consulting requires:

  • Context sensitivity, not just technical expertise
  • Strong communication and synthesis
  • Respect for internal teams who understand ground realities better

8) Reinvent yourself through a diverse network

Many professionals build networks that are too narrow — same college, same company, same type of people. That limits growth. Career reinvention becomes easier when you connect with people outside your immediate circle and expose yourself to different industries, ideas, and opportunities.

Useful moves:

  • Build a more diverse network
  • Volunteer for meaningful projects
  • Publish thoughtful content online on LinkedIn/Blog/Podcast
  • Test a side project or new skill publicly
  • Spend money in upskilling for the skills in demand

9) A strategic side gig can accelerate your career

A side gig is not just extra income. It can be a strategic platform for skill-building, visibility, and reinvention. Whether it is advising a start-up, teaching, organizing a conference, or freelancing on small projects with startups, external work can strengthen your profile and help you pivot faster.

A smart side gig helps you:

  • Learn new skills in real settings
  • Expand your network and credibility
  • Build evidence for your next move

10) Manage your work with realism and quality

One of the fastest ways to lose trust is to overpromise and underdeliver. Good professionals make realistic commitments, break work into manageable parts, and ask for feedback early. Speed matters, but quality matters more.

Simple discipline to follow:

  • Break work into smaller pieces
  • Create a timeline and stick to it
  • Share interim output with your manager for feedback

11) Build modern career relevance

The most relevant professionals today combine people-centered thinking, scalable innovation, and comfort with technology. It is not enough to be smart in theory — you must be useful in practice.

Three modern lenses:

  • Humans @ Center — put people at the center of decisions
  • Innovation @ Scale — solve real problems in ways that can grow
  • Technology @ Speed — use tools and systems to create impact quickly

12) Learn faster by simplifying and rebuilding

When learning something new, do not aim for perfect notes. Start with rough keywords, tentative connections, and mental maps. Then refine. Shorter notes often force deeper thinking, and remaking your understanding is part of real learning.

Better learning habits:

  • Jot down keywords, not long paragraphs
  • Focus on patterns and relationships
  • Rebuild your notes once your understanding improves

13) Negotiate salary with strategy, not emotion

Salary growth depends not just on performance, but also on positioning, timing, and proof of impact. The strongest negotiations are grounded in clarity, market awareness, and confidence.

Remember to:

  • Build leverage and avoid sounding desperate
  • Focus on fixed pay, not just variable components
  • Use evidence of impact to justify your ask
  • Negotiate non-monetary benefits when budgets are tight

14) Build the skills that keep you relevant

Some skills remain foundational no matter what role or industry you are in. Communication, data analysis, and proactive engagement are career multipliers. These are not optional; they are baseline expectations for high-growth professionals.

Always strengthen:

  • Reading, writing, speaking, and listening
  • Excel and practical data analysis
  • Initiative, ownership, and problem-solving attitude

15) Build stuff or sell stuff — ideally both

One of the simplest career truths is this: learn to build something valuable or learn to sell something valuable. Ideally, do both. “Build” means creating useful outcomes. “Sell” means persuading people of their value. Most strong careers combine these two abilities.

16) Develop a mental edge under uncertainty

In tough environments, technical knowledge is not enough. You also need composure, speed of thought, and the ability to act under uncertainty. Career success often depends on staying calm, reading the room, and testing your judgment quickly.

Three good reminders:

  • Trust your first move, but test it fast
  • Stay calm under noise and confusion
  • Always think about both opportunity and exit options

Final takeaway

A strong career is built by stacking advantages over time. Start with the basics. Tell your story well. Know your strengths. Build a network. Create side opportunities. Learn continuously. Communicate your impact. Negotiate wisely. And most importantly, stay consistent.

In simple terms:

  • Resume + LinkedIn + Interview prep = entry
  • Story + strengths + research = differentiation
  • Plan + method + discipline = landing the role
  • Attitude + perseverance + effort = long-term success
Annexure

Jun 20, 2026

2026 Can Be the Real Year of Millets

Millets can address three national challenges at once: the farm income crisis, the climate resilience challenge, and the nutrition gap. That is why 2026 should be treated as the year India finally builds a serious millet economy. Government millet platforms continue to emphasize that these crops are rich in nutrients, resilient under difficult growing conditions, and better suited to climate stress than many water- and input-intensive alternatives. India’s long-term policy messaging since the International Year of Millets has consistently located them at the intersection of nutrition, sustainability, and dryland resilience. 


India contributed
38.4% of global millet production and produced 180.15 lakh tonnes of millets in 2024–25, an increase of 4.43 lakh tonnes over the previous year. India produces around 173 lakh tonnes of millets, accounting for roughly 80% of Asia’s output and about 20% of global production — which means millet policy in India has implications far beyond a niche domestic crop agenda. At that scale, the question is no longer whether millets matter, but whether India can convert its production weight into leadership in nutrition, dryland resilience, value addition, and future food-system design.

If the case for millets is now well established, the real policy question is no longer why they matter, but what it will take to build a functioning millet economy at scale. That requires moving beyond broad advocacy to the concrete bottlenecks and strategic shifts that will determine whether millets remain a campaign theme or become a serious agricultural, nutritional, and market transformation.
  1. Millets: The Triple Crisis Solution: Millet’s address India’s climate, economic, and nutritional crises simultaneously. They are water-efficient, nutrient-dense, and offer resilience in rainfed, low-input environments. 
  2. Nutritional Powerhouse for Consumers: Millets like sorghum, ragi, and bajra are rich in iron, calcium, magnesium, and antioxidants. They are low in glycemic index, support metabolism, and improve immunity, making them superior alternatives to rice and wheat.
  3. Environmental Sustainability and Climate Adaptability: Unlike water-intensive crops, millets thrive in low rainfall and varied temperature zones, needing 33% less irrigation water than rice. Their C4 plant classification enables higher carbon sequestration, aiding climate mitigation.
  4. Farmer-Friendly Crop: Millets are primarily grown in rainfed areas by small and marginal farmers due to low input costs. Yet, low awareness, limited processing infrastructure, and weak market demand keep them economically underutilized.
  5. Barriers to Consumer Adoption: Taste, texture, cooking complexity, and higher prices deter consumers. Many dislike the prep time and unfamiliar flavors, while limited shelf life and poor processing equipment lower product quality and economic value.
  6. Need for Demand-Side Innovations: Recipe development, product mixes, and snack formats can help millets enter the mainstream diet. Government programs (e.g., mid-day meals) and strategic use of branding can aid in popularizing millet-based foods.
  7. Post-Harvest Processing Gaps: Dehulling, drying, and storage of millets are plagued with inefficiencies. With 70–80% grain recovery, wastage is high. Tech R&D for cultivar-specific machinery and better shelf-life is critical.
  8. Segmentation: The Smart Market Strategy: Not all millets suit all needs. A "smart food" segment, government-supported staples, and self-consumption by farmers require mapping millet varieties to market segments—balancing scalability with biodiversity.
  9. FPO-Centric Decentralized Infrastructure: Farm-level processing through Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) is key. It decentralizes operations, improves quality, and keeps value with the farmer. Customized, location-specific infrastructure is vital.
  10. R&D and Industry Collaboration: Only 10% of millet-related tech is known—90% is untapped. Industry players like ITC show how integrating food, hotel, and agri businesses can co-create demand-led value chains for millets.
  11. Beyond Subsidies: New Revenue Models: Traditional support systems (subsidies, free power) are misaligned for millets. Carbon markets and natural resource offsets are emerging as viable income streams for millet growers—promoting eco-friendly farming without burdening the consumer.
  12. Lessons from the Green Revolution: Unlike the Green Revolution's top-down push, millets need micro-level, demand-responsive ecosystems. Integrating producers, processors, policymakers, and marketers is key to enabling a "Brown Revolution."
Ultimately, India must go beyond subsidy-thinking if it wants a genuine millet breakthrough. Millets generate public goods that are still not fully monetized for farmers — lower stress on water, lower exposure to imported fertilizers, stronger dryland resilience, and better nutritional outcomes. That opens the door to new revenue models, whether through sustainability-linked branding, carbon and ecosystem-service frameworks, or premium institutional sourcing. But unlike the Green Revolution, millet expansion cannot succeed through a purely top-down model. It will need a more decentralized, demand-responsive, biodiversity-sensitive ecosystem built jointly by farmers, FPOs, processors, retailers, public institutions and policymakers.

That is why 2026 matters so much. This is the year when pest stress, labour shortages, fertilizer insecurity, climate risk and nutrition policy are all pointing in the same direction. If India responds only with slogans, it will waste the moment. But if it builds the ecosystem seriously — demand, processing, procurement, branding, R&D and decentralized infrastructure — then 2026 really can become the year when millets move from celebration to transformation. 


References

  • Press Information Bureau, Government of India (2025), Shree Anna for Shreshta Bharat: Empowering India through Millets, 8 August 2025. [pib.gov.in], [static.pib.gov.in]
  • NITI Aayog (2023) Promoting Millets in Diets: Best Practices across States/UTs of India. New Delhi: NITI Aayog. Available at: NITI Aayog report (Accessed: 13 June 2026).

Jun 18, 2026

Why farmers will be turning toward millets in 2026?

Across North India, 2026 is beginning to look less like a routine Kharif season and more like a structural turning point in crop choice. Although the United Nations declared 2023 as the International Year of Millets, the actual breakthrough may be happening now, because the push toward millets is no longer being driven only by health campaigns or policy symbolism. It is being driven by hard farm economics, geopolitical uncertainty, and risk management. India already has a strong millet base: official communication in 2025 noted that the country produced 180.15 lakh tonnes of millets in 2024–25, with bajra accounting for 60.3% of output, while government millet platforms continue to position these crops as climate-resilient “Shree Anna” with strategic relevance for food and nutritional security. [4], [5]

The immediate trigger for this shift is the crisis in cotton. Research published in 2025 found that pink bollworm and boll rot can each cause potential yield losses of around 25% in cotton if not effectively managed, while continued resistance and resurgence in Indian cotton zones have kept the crop under pressure. [7]

Farmer accounts suggest that cotton fields which once gave 10–12 quintals per acre in stronger years are, in some pockets, collapsing to near 2.5 quintals per acre under severe pest pressure. Against this, millets such as bajra and jowar are increasingly seen as lower-risk crops: pest exposure is lower, fertilizer use is lighter, irrigation demand is more modest, and harvesting is far easier than cotton’s highly labour-dependent picking model. Farmers also point out that bajra generally matures in 90–95 days, while cotton can hold land for 180–185 days, which makes millets more compatible with flexible annual crop sequences such as bajra → mustard → moong.

This comparison matters because the millet case in 2026 is not just ecological — it is operational. Cotton has become a long-duration, high-maintenance crop with multiple cost centres. Millet cultivation, by contrast, fits the logic of a more stressed farm economy: lower input burden, faster turnaround, easier harvest, and lower dependence on volatile labour and chemical markets. In a year where farmers are trying to preserve cash flow and reduce uncertainty, that advantage becomes decisive.

The second major reason 2026 can become the real year of millets lies beyond the farm gate — in the Strait of Hormuz crisis and its effect on fertilizer security. Since the late-February 2026 escalation in the region, maritime movement through Hormuz has collapsed sharply. UN Trade and Development reported that average daily vessel transits fell from 129 during 1–27 February to just 6 during 1–29 March, effectively bringing one of the world’s most critical energy and fertilizer corridors close to a standstill. UNCTAD also recorded sharp increases in oil and gas prices during the same period leading into high energy and input costs. [1]

For India, this is not a distant shipping story; it is a direct farm-input vulnerability. Government communication in 2025 reaffirmed that India is the second-largest consumer and third-largest producer of fertilizers globally, and that fertilizer support remains central to agricultural policy, with the Department of Fertilizers’ revised 2024–25 budget at ₹1,91,836.29 crore. At the same time, 2026 reporting on the Hormuz disruption highlighted India’s continued import dependence — around 20% of urea, 50% of DAP, and 100% of MOP are imported, while much of the natural gas used in domestic urea production is also imported, raising the system’s overall exposure to global shocks. [6], [2]

The numbers from Kharif 2026 are especially telling. India’s fertilizer requirement for the season was assessed at 390.54 lakh metric tonnes, while available stocks at one stage covered only about 51% of projected demand. Urea import prices reportedly jumped from roughly $510 per tonne in early 2026 to nearly $950 per tonne by April, while domestic production slipped to around 1.5 million tonnes per month because LNG shortages constrained fertilizer plants. In that context, crops that depend heavily on chemical fertilizers become significantly riskier, while lower-input crops like millets look far more sensible. [2], [1]

This is exactly where 2026 departs from the symbolism of 2023. In 2023, millets were celebrated. In 2026, they are becoming economically rational. Millets are no longer just “nutri-cereals” in policy language; they are increasingly becoming resilience crops in practice.

Policy signals are beginning to align with this transition. For Kharif Marketing Season 2026–27, the Government of India raised the MSP for bajra to ₹2,900 per quintal, up from ₹2,775 in 2025–26, and estimated a 56% margin over cost of production. The MSP for jowar hybrid was raised to ₹4,023 per quintal, with similar increases across other nutri-cereals. The government has explicitly stated that in recent years it has continued to promote pulses, oilseeds, and nutri-cereals/Shree Anna by offering relatively stronger MSP support. [3]

India’s Public Distribution System (PDS), implemented through NFSA and PMGKAY, currently provides free food grains to around 80.5 crore beneficiaries through nearly 20.5 crore ration cards, making it the largest food-security programme in the world. Yet, the share of millets in this basket remains extremely low: the latest available evidence shows that, out of 48.7 million tonnes of grain distributed to NFSA beneficiaries, rice accounted for 66.8%, wheat for 31.9%, and millets for just 1.3%. This is a major policy opportunity, because India already produced 18.59 million tonnes of millets in 2024–25, which means the government can expand decentralised MSP procurement of millets in millet-growing states and channel them into the PDS to improve nutrition, support rainfed farmers, and diversify cereal procurement beyond rice and wheat.  [8], [9] [10],[13]

Such a shift would also help fight climate change: millet cultivation requires only about 79 litres of irrigated water per kg, compared with 596 litres for rice and 729 litres for wheat, and research suggests that replacing 1 kg of rice with millet for 20 crore PDS beneficiaries could reduce the programme’s true cost by about US$1.37 billion per year, thanks to lower water stress and lower environmental damage. [11], [12]

Hence, the caution remains critical: farmers do not need only declared MSPs, they need actual procurement or credible price realization. A “paper MSP” does not change cropping behaviour if traders continue to buy well below the announced price. That is why 2026 could become either the real year of millets — or another missed opportunity. The difference will depend on whether policy moves beyond announcement and into procurement, processing, market-building, and value-chain support.


References

  1. UNCTAD, From gas to grain: Fertilizer disruptions raise risks for food security and trade — shipping collapse, oil/gas shock, Hormuz disruption. [businessaajkal.com]
  2. The New Indian Express, Strait of Hormuz blockade triggers fertiliser squeeze ahead of Kharif season — India’s fertilizer requirement, stock coverage, urea import price surge, production disruption. [newsfirstprime.com]
  3. PIB, Cabinet approves MSP for Kharif Crops for Marketing Season 2026–27 — official MSP for bajra, jowar and other crops. [insightsonindia.com]
  4. PIB, Shree Anna for Shreshta Bharat — millet production, bajra share, export figures. [agrofoodbusiness.com]
  5. Directorate of Millets Development, Government of India — policy framing on IYoM and millet significance. [ensureias.com]
  6. PIB, Empowering India’s Farmers Through Strategic Fertilizer Policy — fertilizer budget, production status, policy framing. [agricultur....institute]
  7. Agricultural Systems / Science Explorer, Field estimates of current and predicted cotton yield loss due to pink bollworm and boll rot in India — cotton loss estimates and pest burden. [thediplomat.com]
  8. Press Information Bureau (1 Feb 2025) – “Key Schemes Driving Food Security Across Nation” (PDS coverage: 20.5 crore ration cards, 80.5 crore beneficiaries). [pib.gov.in]
  9. Press Information Bureau (20 Dec 2024) – “Year-End Review of Department of Food and Public Distribution – 2024” (around 80 crore beneficiaries under PMGKAY). [pib.gov.in]
  10. ICRISAT / Tata-Cornell Institute (May 2024) – “Including Millets in the Public Distribution System” (millets’ 1.3% share in PDS; water-use comparisons). [pressroom....crisat.org]
  11. PIB Backgrounder (4 Apr 2026) – “India’s Resilient Production Systems in Agriculture” (2024–25 millet production: 18.59 million tonnes). [pib.gov.in]
  12. Tata-Cornell Institute (May 2024) – “Millets Are Key to Making the PDS Environmentally Friendly” (US$1.37 billion annual true-cost reduction estimate). [tci.cornell.edu]
  13. Tata-Cornell Institute (Oct 2023) – “Millets Make Sense for India’s PDS” (case for local procurement and PDS diversification). [tci.cornell.edu]

Jun 13, 2026

Why the Hormuz Crisis Should Redefine Fertilizer Reform

India’s agriculture debate has moved beyond foodgrain output toward nutrition, crop diversification, millets, and climate resilience. But that ambition will remain incomplete unless India reforms the most politically sensitive part of its farm economy: fertilizers. The Department of Fertilizers continues to define timely and affordable fertilizer availability as central to agricultural production, and the sector matters because agriculture and allied activities contribute nearly 16% of GDP and support over 46% of India’s population. [1], [11]

The fiscal scale is immense. In Budget 2025–26, food subsidy was pegged at ₹2,03,420 crore and fertilizer subsidy at about ₹1.67 lakh crore, taking the combined total to roughly ₹3.71 lakh crore. Departmental budget documents also show that subsidy support remains heavily concentrated in urea subsidy and nutrient-based subsidy (NBS), reinforcing how dependent the system still is on direct state financing. [3], [2]

India has improved domestic production, but vulnerability remains. Official policy communication notes that India is the second-largest consumer and third-largest producer of fertilizers globally, while domestic urea production crossed 314 LMT in 2023–24 after six new plants added 76.2 LMT of capacity. Yet the Economic Survey 2025–26 shows that in 2024–25 India consumed 32.93 million tonnes of nutrients, against domestic production of 22.07 million tonnes and imports of 8.84 million tonnes, underlining continued dependence on imported raw materials, intermediates, and finished products. [11], [2]

That vulnerability was starkly exposed during the 2026 Strait of Hormuz crisis. UNCTAD reported that vessel traffic through Hormuz fell by over 95%, with daily transit dropping from more than 100 vessels in late February to single digits in March. At the same time, the World Bank reported that its fertilizer price index rose by more than 12% quarter-on-quarter in Q1 2026, while urea prices climbed above $850 per tonne in April, up 80% since February, as gas, ammonia, sulfur, and fertilizer flows from the Gulf were disrupted. [15], [17]

India responded through inventory-building and supply rerouting, but the stress was real. By early June 2026, officials said total fertilizer requirement for the kharif season had been reassessed at 38.39 MT, while stock stood at 19.98 MT, or over 52% of requirement. The same briefing noted that the government had built up 13.24 MT of fertilizer stock after the West Asia crisis began, yet global urea prices had still jumped to around $947 per tonne, compared with $447 per tonne in February. That is a reminder that fertilizer policy is no longer just an agricultural issue; it is a question of strategic economic resilience. [5], [15]

This exposes the limits of the current subsidy model. Urea remains the most tightly controlled fertilizer segment, with the state cushioning prices and compensating producers or importers. That protects affordability, but it also creates rigidities: innovation is weak, nutrient use remains skewed, and incentives are focused more on moving subsidized product than on rewarding better farmer choices. Official descriptions of the subsidy architecture show that, even after DBT-enabled sales at the retail level, subsidy still largely flows through firms and products rather than being redesigned as a direct farmer-centred performance incentive. [1]

There have, however, been important incremental reforms. The One Nation, One Fertilizer framework was launched to reduce brand-led criss-cross movement, improve availability, and streamline the supply chain. Government communication and parliamentary responses indicate that the objective was to increase the availability basket, reduce confusion among farmers, and ensure timely supply, while separate policy reporting set a target of bringing the average transport lead down from 700–750 km to around 500 km. [8], [4], [13]

This reform was tied to a broader distribution architecture. In October 2022, the government launched 600 Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samruddhi Kendras (PMKSKs) and stated that more than 3.25 lakh fertilizer shops would gradually be developed into such centres. The idea was that these would not function only as fertilizer outlets, but also as platforms for soil testing, seed access, and agronomic information. That is strategically important today, because resilience will not come from moving subsidized bags faster alone; it will come from giving farmers integrated input advice and localized decision support. [10]

That wider input perspective matters because fertilizers are only one pillar of the agri-input economy. The other two are seeds and crop protection chemicals. Recent reporting and policy explainers show that India’s organized pesticide market is now worth about ₹24,500 crore, with herbicides at ₹8,200 crore emerging as the fastest-growing segment after insecticides. The main driver is labour scarcity: manual weeding takes 8–10 hours per acre, whereas herbicide application may take 1–2 hours, and agricultural wage rates rose from roughly ₹326 in 2019 to about ₹447 in 2024. [7], [16], [14]

This shift has two implications for fertilizer reform. First, it shows that Indian agriculture is moving toward a more integrated, time-sensitive input economy, where fertilizer efficiency increasingly depends on synchronized decisions around weeds, labour, irrigation, and cropping windows. Second, it demonstrates that resilience can no longer be measured only in fertilizer tonnage or subsidy outlay. If herbicides are becoming labour-saving tools “like tractors,” then the policy system needs to think in terms of whole-farm input resilience, not isolated fertilizer policy. PMKSKs, if properly developed, could become the institutional interface where fertilizer recommendations, crop protection choices, and soil-health information converge. [16], [10]

The next reform step should therefore be more structural: move gradually from blanket product subsidy toward direct farmer benefit transfer, while protecting smallholders. Reform advocates argue that such a transition could generate substantial savings — in some estimates around ₹40,000 crore annually — while allowing support to be linked to balanced nutrient use, soil testing, and better agronomic outcomes rather than simply subsidizing volume. It would also create room for differentiated products, including fortified and customized fertilizers such as zinc-enriched formulations, to compete on value rather than being trapped in a rigid administered-price framework. The challenge, however, is political communication: any visible urea price adjustment without a credible explanation could trigger backlash, so reform would need to be framed clearly as subsidy redesign, not subsidy withdrawal[12]

At the same time, fertilizer reform should not be confused with indiscriminate chemical intensification. The government’s own policy framework supports more balanced nutrient management through the NBS regime, while Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana (PKVY) had, by early 2025, supported around 15 lakh hectares, formed 52,289 clusters, and benefited 25.3 lakh farmers under organic farming promotion. Organic, bio-based, and natural alternatives have a role, but they work best when integrated into a scientifically grounded strategy that also protects yield, soil fertility, and affordability. [12], [9]

To blunt the economic shock from a Strait of Hormuz disruption, India should target a 30–40% increase in domestic nitrogen (ammonia/urea) production capacity within 3–5 years by completing brownfield expansions and restarting idled units, while fast‑tracking 1–2 large green‑ammonia pilots (100–200 ktpa each) within 5 years. Simultaneously, diversify phosphate‑rock imports to ensure at least three viable alternative corridors (for example: Arabian Sea–Red Sea transshipment, overland routes via Iran/Afghanistan/Central Asia where feasible, and direct shipments from West/Central Africa) and sign 5–8 medium‑term (3–5 year) supply contracts to cover 60–70% of current annual phosphate demand. 

India should invest in strategic ammonia storage equivalent to 60–90 days of national feedstock needs (roughly 0.5–1.0 million tonnes capacity depending on demand scenario), and build 3–5 coastal and inland handling hubs with associated safety and blending facilities within 4 years. Pair these measures with fiscal incentives (10–20% capex support), streamlined clearances (single‑window approvals within 90 days), and an emergency fertilizer buffer procurement fund of INR 5,000–10,000 crore to subsidize seasonal shortfalls and stabilize farm prices.

The core lesson of the Hormuz crisis is clear: crop resilience cannot be built without input resilience. India has strengthened domestic fertilizer capacity, improved movement planning, and expanded the institutional architecture of input delivery. The next step is to redesign subsidies so they reward outcomes, support innovation, and reduce strategic vulnerability across fertilizers, agrochemicals, seeds, and advisory systems. In the era of millets, nutrition, and climate risk, fertilizer policy must evolve from a recurring fiscal burden into a strategic pillar of agricultural resilience. [1], [5]


References (Harvard style)

  1. Department of Fertilizers, Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers, Government of India (2024) Annual Report 2023–24. New Delhi: Government of India. Available at: https://fert.gov.in/sites/default/files/2025-04/Annual_Report_fertilizer_English.pdf [fert.gov.in]
  2. Department of Fertilisers (2025) Department of Fertilisers – Demand for Grants 2025–26. New Delhi: Government of India Budget. Available at: https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/doc/eb/sbe6.pdf [indiabudget.gov.in]
  3. Economic Times (2025) Budget 2025: Food, fertilizer subsidy pegged marginally higher at Rs 3.71 lakh crore for FY26. 1 February. Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/budget-2025-food-fertilizer-subsidy-pegged-marginally-higher-at-rs-3-71-lk-cr-for-fy26/articleshow/117824686.cms [economicti...atimes.com]
  4. ETGovernment (2022) One Nation, One Fertilizer: All subsidised fertilizers to be sold under ‘Bharat’ brand from Oct. 29 August. Available at: https://government.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/governance/one-nation-one-fertilizer-all-subsidised-fertilizers-to-be-sold-under-bharat-brand-from-oct/93847900 [government...atimes.com]
  5. Financial Express (2026) Fertiliser demand estimate for kharif season revised downwards. 1 June. Available at: https://www.financialexpress.com/policy/economy/fertiliser-demand-estimate-for-kharif-season-revised-downwards/4256632/ [financialexpress.com]
  6. Government of India (2026) Economic Survey 2025–26, Statistical Appendix, Table 1.22: Production, Imports and Consumption of Fertilizers. New Delhi: Government of India. Available at: https://indiabudget.gov.in/economicsurvey/doc/stat/tab1.22.pdf [indiabudget.gov.in]
  7. InsightsIAS (2025) Changing Trends in India’s Pesticide Market. 5 August. Available at: https://www.insightsonindia.com/2025/08/05/changing-trends-in-indias-pesticide-market/ [insightsonindia.com]
  8. Lok Sabha (2024) Unstarred Question No. 850: One Nation One Fertilizer Scheme, answered on 26 July 2024. Available at: https://www.sansad.in/getFile/loksabhaquestions/annex/182/AU850_ZsdgMQ.pdf?source=pqals [sansad.in]
  9. Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare (2025) Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana (PKVY): Nurturing Organic Farming in India. Press Information Bureau, 7 October. Available at: https://pib.gov.in/FaqDetails.aspx?id=155374&NoteId=155374&ModuleId=4 [pib.gov.in]
  10. Press Information Bureau, Government of India (2022) Prime Minister Inaugurates 600 Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samruddhi Kendras; Launches Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Urvarak Pariyojana – One Nation One Fertiliser. 17 October. Available at: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1868496 [pib.gov.in]
  11. Press Information Bureau, Government of India (2025) Amrit Kaal: Empowering India’s Farmers Through Strategic Fertilizer Policy. 3 August. Available at: https://pib.gov.in/PressNoteDetails.aspx?NoteId=154966&ModuleId=3 and https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2025/aug/doc202583598601.pdf [pib.gov.in], [static.pib.gov.in]
  12. Press Information Bureau (2026) Supporting Balanced Fertilization: Nutrient-Based Subsidy Rates for Rabi 2025–26. 5 January. Available at: https://pib.gov.in/PressNoteDetails.aspx?NoteId=156820&ModuleId=3 [pib.gov.in]
  13. The Hindu (2022) Single brand to help cut fertilizer cost: Union Minister. 28 August. Available at: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/pmbjp-will-cut-fertilizers-logistics-subsidy-cost-mandaviya/article65819257.ece [thehindu.com]
  14. The Indian Express (2025) How India’s pesticide market is changing. 4 August. Listing available via: https://indianexpress.com/about/pesticide/ [indianexpress.com]
  15. UNCTAD (2026) From gas to grain: Fertilizer disruptions raise risks for food security and trade. 30 March. Available at: https://unctad.org/news/gas-grain-fertilizer-disruptions-raise-risks-food-security-and-trade [unctad.org]
  16. Vajiram & Ravi (2025) India’s Herbicide Boom: Changing Trends in Crop Protection. 7 August. Available at: https://vajiramandravi.com/current-affairs/indias-herbicide-boom-changing-trends-in-crop-protection/ [vajiramandravi.com]
  17. World Bank (2026) Fertilizer prices surge as Strait of Hormuz disruptions tighten supplies. 14 May. Available at: https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/opendata/fertilizer-prices-surge-as-strait-of-hormuz-disruptions-tighten- [blogs.worldbank.org]